Find the wrinkles in any argument.
Paste an argument and Mindwrinkles surfaces its hidden assumptions, logical gaps, and weak points, then scores the reasoning in a shareable card.
The problem
You meet confident arguments everywhere: your feed, the headlines, a meeting. Most aren’t simply true or false. They’re bundles of claims, hidden assumptions, and quiet leaps of logic.
So you agree, argue, or scroll past, without really knowing if the reasoning holds. Mindwrinkles lays it bare, so you can decide what to actually think.
What you get
Everything an argument is made of, laid bare
A full read on the reasoning, from the core argument to the weak points, scored across three dimensions into one shareable Reasoning Integrity number.
Reasoning scorecard
Every analysis rolls up into a shareable Reasoning Integrity score across three reasoning dimensions (Premises, Inference, Resilience): the number worth sharing.
Hidden assumptions
What must be true for the argument to hold, and how it changes if each one fails.
Logical gaps
The spots where the conclusion doesn’t quite follow: shaky leaps, shifting definitions, claims that reach too far.
Fallacy risks
Possible reasoning failures with severity and confidence, never a smug verdict.
Weak points
Fuzzy terms, ignored exceptions, and evidence that can’t carry the claim.
Argument structure
The conclusion, the reasons meant to support it, and where it quietly leans on a missing premise.
Counterarguments
The strongest opposing pressure, and the evidence that would back it up.
Evidence needed
Exactly what evidence would support, weaken, or clarify the argument.
How it works
From a messy opinion to a clear scorecard
Paste an argument and Mindwrinkles breaks it into its parts, shows you where it bends, and scores the reasoning. Nothing to set up.
- 01
Paste an argument
Your own thesis, a claim in the news, or a hot take from your feed.
- 02
See its structure
The core argument, the reasons behind it, and the assumptions holding it up.
- 03
Find where it bends
Logical gaps, fallacy risks, weak points, and the strongest counterarguments.
- 04
Get your scorecard
A Reasoning Integrity score across three reasoning dimensions, ready to share.
Made to share
One number any argument earns, and a card worth sharing.
Reasoning Integrity rolls the three reasoning dimensions into a single, memorable stat card: the strongest dimension, the weakest, and the biggest reasoning risk. A number to share; the full breakdown to back it up.
- Strongest & weakest dimension at a glance
- Flagged fallacy risk, with severity
- Export-ready for LinkedIn, X, and more
Why Mindwrinkles
Not a chatbot. Not a fact-checker. A reasoning instrument.
Structure-first, not answers
It shows the shape of the argument before it ever nudges you toward a conclusion.
Inspectable by design
A process you can follow and edit, not a single answer you have to take on faith.
Honest about uncertainty
“Possible reasoning failure,” with severity and confidence, never a smug verdict.
Reasoning ≠ fact-checking
It tells you what evidence would be needed, instead of pretending to verify the world.
Pricing
Simple, honest, no subscription
A free tier to explore, one-time Lifetime access for regular use, and pay-as-you-go credits for deep research.
Free
$0
Experience the value, no card required.
- 3 analyses per day
- Full workspace: overview, argument map and scorecard
- Shareable scorecard image
- Your 5 most recent analyses
- Standard reasoning model
Lifetime
$34 one-time
Pay once. No subscription, ever.
- Stronger reasoning models (deeper, more reliable analysis)
- Unlimited analyses (subject to fair use)
- Full saved library
- Longer inputs
- Annotated text with every finding pinned to it
- Deep dive report with export
- Shareable scorecard image
- All future Standard features
Power Research
Credits
Coming soon. Pay-as-you-go for source-backed depth.
- Source-backed evidence mode
- Longer inputs & deep reports
- Citation-ready output
- Buy credits in simple packs
FAQ
Questions, answered
Any argument: your own thesis, a claim in the news, a hot take from your feed, a proposal at work. If someone’s trying to convince you of something, you can stress-test it.
No. It checks the reasoning, not the facts: the assumptions, gaps, and weak points an argument rests on, plus what evidence would settle it. Source-backed research is a separate, optional mode.
No. It shows you how an argument is built and where it bends, then leaves the verdict to you. It makes the reasoning visible; you decide what to actually think.
Never as a gotcha. Reasoning risks come with a severity, a confidence level, and a suggested fix, not a verdict. It points; you decide.
A free tier with 3 analyses a day, a one-time Lifetime option ($34) with no subscription, and pay-as-you-go credits for source-backed research (coming soon).
Your analyses are yours. We never sell them, and you can delete any of them whenever you like.
Get started
Find the wrinkles in any argument.
Create a free account and run your first analysis in minutes. No credit card.
Start freeFree tier, no credit card.